ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø

Residents argue the plan to have Contrecœur terminal to eventually handle an estimated 1.5 million containers annually is one that is harmful to health, the environment, as well as being unnecessary. 

The federal government and port officials say the project is to meet a future need but its opponents have argued it doesn't fall under a project of national interest under Bill C-5 to increase ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø autonomy, as it would increase dependence on foreign countries while circumventing ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø and Quebec environmental laws.

However, the Montreal Port Authority says in a statement the project has undergone a comprehensive environmental assessment process and received a favourable decision.

Hélène Reeves, spokesperson for the Vigie citoyenne Port de Contrecœur, a citizen-driven movement, says she was taken aback after hearing Quebec Premier François Legault describe the St. Lawrence River as a "highway" that allows for moving goods while emitting less greenhouse gases.

Reeves said in an interview on Sunday that economic vision is outdated and that it is harmful to pursue an economy that destroys the environment while in the midst of a climate crisis.

The port authority is moving ahead with preparatory work, which includes installing fences and access roads, constructing work platforms, selective tree cutting, and outfitting offices at the site, about 45 kilometres northeast of Montreal.

The work also involves dredging the bottom of the St. Lawrence River, habitat of the copper redhorse, an endangered fish species. It needs approval from Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

This report by ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø was first published Oct. 26, 2025.