FILE - Attorneys and backers of an effort to make a ban on non-unanimous jury verdicts retroactive in New Orleans gather on the steps of the state Supreme Court building, Tuesday, May 10, 2022, after the court heard arguments. Prohibitions against non-unanimous jury convictions — outlawed by Louisiana voters in 2018 and, later, by the U.S. Supreme Court — do not have to apply retroactively to earlier convictions, Louisiana's highest court ruled Friday, Oct. 21, 2022. (AP Photo/Kevin McGill, File)
FILE - Attorneys and backers of an effort to make a ban on non-unanimous jury verdicts retroactive in New Orleans gather on the steps of the state Supreme Court building, Tuesday, May 10, 2022, after the court heard arguments. Prohibitions against non-unanimous jury convictions — outlawed by Louisiana voters in 2018 and, later, by the U.S. Supreme Court — do not have to apply retroactively to earlier convictions, Louisiana's highest court ruled Friday, Oct. 21, 2022. (AP Photo/Kevin McGill, File)
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Prohibitions against nonunanimous jury convictions — outlawed by Louisiana voters in 2018 and, later, by the U.S. Supreme Court — do not have to apply retroactively to earlier convictions, Louisiana's highest court ruled Friday.
The ruling came in the case of Reginald Reddick, convicted of murder by a 10-2 jury vote in 1997.
In 2018, Louisiana voters approved a constitutional amendment prohibiting nonunanimous verdicts in trials for crimes committed after Jan. 1, 2019. At the time, Louisiana was one of only two states allowing such verdicts.
In 2020, the that nonunanimous verdicts were unconstitutional, broadening the effect of the state constitutional amendment.
But in 2021, the Supreme Court made clear that the decision against non-unanimous verdicts applied only to future cases and cases in which the defendants’ appeals had not been exhausted.
In arguments before the state Supreme Court in May, Jamila Johnson, arguing for Reddick, said the practice of allowing nonunanimous convictions is rooted in late 19th century Jim Crow laws that made for easier convictions of Black defendants.
And she said the racial unfairness of the case made the problems with the law “structural in nature,†so it did not matter if the defendant in a particular case was white or that the appellate record is now unclear on the race of the jury members who voted to acquit her client in 1997.
ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø. All rights reserved.
It’s a little-known fact that Canada’s credit unions are among the country’s stron…
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
